Image for post
Image for post
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D) NY, shares an Oval Office sofa with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) Kentucky last December

Is It Fair To Slam Chuck Schumer For Allowing A Whole Big Bunch Of Trump Nominated Judges To Fly Through The Senate This Week?

Short Answer: Yes.

In the final hours before the Senate’s Labor Day break, Minority Leader Schumer cut a deal with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, allowing him to ram 7 more Trump nominees through to federal district courts, bringing the August total to 15, with 8 more approvals slated as soon as the Senate gets back next week. There are 94 District Courts, which feed into 13 Federal Courts of Appeals (those are the ones you generally hear the most about), and then the Supreme Court.

Of course, McConnell’s been playing this game for a long time, and when Obama was President he played it in reverse: denying many nominees, most notably Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, who “morphed” into super-Conservative Neil Gorsuch after Trump took the reins. And even though conventional wisdom is Democrats have very little chance of retaking the Senate this year, conventional wisdom also had Trump with next to no chance of winning, and McConnell still put down all his chips on that outcome. No wonder he’s not willing to take any chances even if the possibility of things cutting the other way seem slim.

Which would seem even more of a reason to try to stall him out.

While we’re not usually in favor of fighting losing battles, because it often distracts from equally important winnable causes, in this case we kind of think it’s what Schumer, et. al. are paid to do, so they should be out there. One judicial activist (and former Schumer aide) likened the Minority Leader’s inaction to “bringing a butter knife to a gunfight”. We don’t even see the butter knife.

There is one big difference between now and the waning years of the Obama Presidency. Back then, Republicans controlled the Senate and since all federal judges must be approved by the Senate, they could run roughshod over Obama’s nominees. Since Democrats now do not control the Senate, they can’t really ultimately block anybody. But there are lots of things they can do to make life difficult for Trump and his Republican cohorts. In fact, here’s a series of Tweets from the previous Democratic leader’s former Chief of Staff, clearly outlining exactly what Democrats can and should be doing (if it’s too small to read, click on the image for a bigger version and also the full string of Tweets):

Image for post
Image for post

So why did Schumer give this week’s nominees a free pass? Did some Democratic Senators — particularly those in red states — desperately need to go home to campaign and McConnell’s kept them trapped in Washington practically all month by cancelling the August recess? Is it because McConnell made him some vague promise to start some kind of committee to think about renaming the Russell Senate office building in honor of John McCain (a Republican), meaning it’ll never actually happen? Did he offer Schumer something we don’t know about? Or was it just that this round of nominees aren’t the worst of the bunch and Schumer knows the numbers are against him anyway? Anybody’s guess…

What isn’t a guess is that when Trump throws around superlatives about how many judges he’s named, he ain’t kidding: 60 so far. 33 district court judges (plus 8 more on tap for next week), 26 appeals court judges and one Supreme Court Justice (with #2, Brett Kavanaugh, waiting in the wings). Those big numbers are partly because there were so many open judgeships as the result of McConnell blocking so many nominees when Obama was the President doing the nominating.

Or is Schumer reacting to the fact that when Democrats do move to block a nomination, Republicans these days condemn it as a craven political stunt, and Trump Tweets about the “unfairness” of it endlessly?So much so that it could potentially drive more Republicans to the polls in protest this November? To us, that’s even more of a reason to fight back. Because when Republicans were doing exactly the same thing for years, Democrats treated it more-or-less as a fact of life. Why? Are Democrats naturally more fatalistic?

No matter what the reason, it’s time for that to stop.

Also keep in mind that the nominees so far have been vetted and shepherded by White House Counsel Don McGahn, who is a Conservative, but generally seems to be a principled guy and definitely one of the “grown ups”. Except now Trump is showing him the door. According to the New York Times’ Julie Davis, the President let him know in a Tweet. So who knows what fresh hell the next White House Counsel, likely more of a Trump cultist, will bring? This thought from Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley, who was also complicit in the mass-blocking of Obama nominees (and who’s also a master of the Tweet):

Image for post
Image for post

Roll Call, which is usually very even-handed, reports the judges who passed through in this latest round are “not particularly partisan or controversial”, and that may be true. But that doesn’t mean when we dug a little deeper we didn’t find some interesting nuggets. Both good and bad, actually.

So pretty good so far, right?

Not so fast:

So let’s think again before we say this bunch is beyond reproach.

Written by

Peabody award winning journalist. Streaming media pioneer. Played @ CBGB back in the day. Editor-In-Chief "The Chaos Report" www.thechaosreport.com

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store