Something That Bears Repeating In Light Of Supreme Court’s EPA Ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling limiting the power of the Environmental Protection Agency (and by that ruling, other agencies too), probably would’ve happened anyway.
By that I mean even before the current makeup of the court. When Justices Kennedy and Scalia are still there. Or even minus the “stolen seat”.
Which is why I haven’t addressed it with the same ferocity or urgency as the other recent precedent-toppling Supreme Court cases that are very much rooted in radical Christian fundamentalism: abortion, separation between church and state, public school prayer.
When Justice Kennedy sided with Liberals on the Court, most notably ruling in favor of same-sex marriage, these were moral and ethical issues. Not business-related. So while I can’t say for sure Justice Kennedy would’ve voted the same way his replacement and heir Justice Kavanaugh did, he was pretty pro-business down the line.
In fact, the few social issues he sided with Liberals on tended to have pro-business components if you sit down and think about it. In fact, the Koch brothers, who were/are (one of them’s now dead) often presented as the paragons of pro-business-deregulate-everything conservatism, were in favor of same-sex marriage. Also in favor of immigration reform. Why?
Well, could be because they are true Libertarians and actually do live by a definable code — however despicable sometimes it may be — not just whatever they feel like best meets their theological zeal on a certain day.
Also, it’s good for business: support immigration reform to ensure a flow of cheap labor into the country. Support same sex marriage because makes it a lot easier to hire people, and figure out what benefits they’ll get from the government, and how they’re taxed; really does simplify all that big time for a major employer.
That doesn’t mean I think the Court’s EPA decision was a good one, just that it was pretty much inevitable no matter what, given whom the country has decided to elect as president during the past few decades. And who’s running the more secular aspects of what constitutes civic society and the government’s…